[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1371102507.3252.96.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:48:27 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/2] macvtap: slient sparse warnings
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 12:21 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> This patch silents the following sparse warnings:
>
> dr
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/macvtap.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/if_macvlan.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> index 992151c..acf55ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static int macvtap_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> if (!q)
> goto out;
>
> - q->sock.wq = &q->wq;
> + rcu_assign_pointer(q->sock.wq, &q->wq);
Since nobody but you [1] can access this object at that time, you could
rather use
RCU_INIT_POINTER(q->sock.wq, &q->wq);
rcu_assign_pointer() is also a documentation point (memory barrier)
By using RCU_INIT_POINTER() you clearly show that you know you need no
memory barrier.
> init_waitqueue_head(&q->wq.wait);
[1] :
or else, this init_waitqueue_head() should be done _before_ the
rcu_asign_pointer()
> q->sock.type = SOCK_RAW;
> q->sock.state = SS_CONNECTED;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists