[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51B9666C.7090108@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:27:56 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/2] macvtap: slient sparse warnings
On 06/13/2013 01:48 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 12:21 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> This patch silents the following sparse warnings:
>>
>> dr
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/macvtap.c | 2 +-
>> include/linux/if_macvlan.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
>> index 992151c..acf55ba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
>> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static int macvtap_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>> if (!q)
>> goto out;
>>
>> - q->sock.wq = &q->wq;
>> + rcu_assign_pointer(q->sock.wq, &q->wq);
> Since nobody but you [1] can access this object at that time, you could
> rather use
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(q->sock.wq, &q->wq);
>
> rcu_assign_pointer() is also a documentation point (memory barrier)
>
> By using RCU_INIT_POINTER() you clearly show that you know you need no
> memory barrier.
>
True.
>> init_waitqueue_head(&q->wq.wait);
> [1] :
> or else, this init_waitqueue_head() should be done _before_ the
> rcu_asign_pointer()
Thanks, I will send v2 by using RCU_INIT_POINTER().
>
>> q->sock.type = SOCK_RAW;
>> q->sock.state = SS_CONNECTED;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists