netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: ping_check_bind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 01:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	fengguang.wu@...el.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: ping_check_bind_addr() etc. can be
 static

From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:04:16 +0800

> net/ipv4/ping.c:286:5: sparse: symbol 'ping_check_bind_addr' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/ipv4/ping.c:355:6: sparse: symbol 'ping_set_saddr' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/ipv4/ping.c:370:6: sparse: symbol 'ping_clear_saddr' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> net/ipv6/ping.c:60:5: sparse: symbol 'dummy_ipv6_recv_error' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/ipv6/ping.c:64:5: sparse: symbol 'dummy_ip6_datagram_recv_ctl' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/ipv6/ping.c:69:5: sparse: symbol 'dummy_icmpv6_err_convert' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/ipv6/ping.c:73:6: sparse: symbol 'dummy_ipv6_icmp_error' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/ipv6/ping.c:75:5: sparse: symbol 'dummy_ipv6_chk_addr' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/ipv6/ping.c:201:5: sparse: symbol 'ping_v6_seq_show' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html