netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Further SCTP changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130619.183903.2165829460238667637.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dborkman@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Further SCTP changes

From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:55:15 +0200

> Mostly it's all about getting rid of unnecessary code, and/or making
> it more clean and readable.
> 
> Code has been tested with lksctp-tools functional test suite and
> also my small sctp stress test helper that was used to discover
> the recent null-ptr derefs. This test was also sucessfully run against
> auth_enabled=0 and auth_enabled=1, where I also previously applied
> the following two patches:
> 
>   - http://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=137121898331017&w=2
>     -> not yet applied, still pending review for crypto tree
>   - 1abd165 (net: sctp: fix NULL pointer dereference in socket destruction)
>     -> cherry picked from net tree
> 
> Daniel Borkmann (5):
>   net: sctp: remove TEST_FRAME ifdef
>   ktime: add ms_to_ktime() and ktime_add_ms() helpers
>   net: sctp: migrate cookie life from timeval to ktime
>   net: sctp: decouple cleaning socket data from endpoint
>   net: sctp: minor: sctp_seq_dump_local_addrs add missing newline

The discussion of this patch series has taken a tangent towards a
talk about how to do TX based socket accounting differently.

While that's interesting, it'd be good to get ACKs for Daniel's
patches meanwhile, I think they are fine personally.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html