netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] netdev: octeon_mgmt: Correct tx IFG workaround.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1371692239.2146.7.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:37:19 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] netdev: octeon_mgmt: Correct tx IFG workaround.

On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 18:28 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 06/19/2013 06:08 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 17:40 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> >> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
> >>
> >> The previous fix was still too agressive to meet ieee specs.  Increase
> >> to (14, 10).
> > []
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/octeon/octeon_mgmt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/octeon/octeon_mgmt.c
> > []
> >> @@ -1141,10 +1141,13 @@ static int octeon_mgmt_open(struct net_device *netdev)
> >>   		/* For compensation state to lock. */
> >>   		ndelay(1040 * NS_PER_PHY_CLK);
> >>
> >> -		/* Some Ethernet switches cannot handle standard
> >> -		 * Interframe Gap, increase to 16 bytes.
> >> +		/* Default Interframe Gaps are too small.  Recommended
> >> +		 * workaround is.
> >> +		 *
> >> +		 * AGL_GMX_TX_IFG[IFG1]=14
> >> +		 * AGL_GMX_TX_IFG[IFG2]=10
> >
> > Why isn't the TX IFG just 96 bit times?
> 
> I don't have a full understanding of how the transistors are wired up on 
> the chip, so I cannot accurately answer your question.  But I can say 
> that after I empirically found the previous values to get the thing to 
> work, the hardware designers independently found that the values 
> supplied in this patch are required to achieve industry standard IFGs 
> with this hardware.

For one specific chip or for the Octeon entire family?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html