[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1372088554.1896.3.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:42:34 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Ricardo Landim <ricardolan@...il.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: UDP splice
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 07:04 -0300, Ricardo Landim wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am developing a RTP proxy for voip applications and tried use the
> splice syscall
> for zero copy. I am trying splice udp data to pipe and splice pipe to udp
> socket.
>
> I read some information of the splice function and reading the kernel
> source code I saw this lines in net/ipv4/af_inet.c
>
> const struct proto_ops inet_stream_ops = {
> ...
> .splice_read = tcp_splice_read,
> ...
> }
>
> const struct proto_ops inet_dgram_ops = {
> ...
> ...
> }
>
> There is an implementation of splice for TCP socket but not for UDP socket.
>
> My question is: there is some limitation in UDP socket that prevents this
> implementation?
splice() works with streams, but UDP is a message-oriented protocol.
How would a UDP implementation of splice() decide where to put the
message boundaries, or to distinguish the messages?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists