[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DAAD92.4010708@hunenet.nl>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:16:18 +0200
From: Dion Kant <g.w.kant@...enet.nl>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: pull on receive skb may need to happen
earlier
On 07/08/2013 11:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 05.07.13 at 16:53, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:32:41AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>>> @@ -831,6 +831,15 @@ static RING_IDX xennet_fill_frags(struct
>>> RING_GET_RESPONSE(&np->rx, ++cons);
>>> skb_frag_t *nfrag = &skb_shinfo(nskb)->frags[0];
>>>
>>> + if (nr_frags == MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
>>> + unsigned int pull_to = NETFRONT_SKB_CB(skb)->pull_to;
>>> +
>>> + BUG_ON(pull_to <= skb_headlen(skb));
>>> + __pskb_pull_tail(skb, pull_to - skb_headlen(skb));
>>
>> skb_headlen is in fact "skb->len - skb->data_len". Looking at the
>> caller code:
>>
>> while loop {
>> skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0].page_offset = rx->offset;
>> skb_frag_size_set(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0], rx->status);
>> skb->data_len = rx->status;
>>
>> i = xennet_fill_frags(np, skb, &tmpq);
>>
>> /*
>>
>> * Truesize is the actual allocation size, even if the
>>
>> * allocation is only partially used.
>>
>> */
>> skb->truesize += PAGE_SIZE * skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
>> skb->len += skb->data_len;
>> }
>>
>> handle_incoming_packet();
>>
>> You seem to be altering the behavior of the original code, because in
>> your patch the skb->len is incremented before use, while in the original
>> code (which calls skb_headlen in handle_incoming_packet) the skb->len is
>> correctly set.
>
> Right. So I basically need to keep skb->len up-to-date along with
> ->data_len. Just handed a patch to Dion with that done; I'll defer
> sending a v2 for the upstream code until I know the change works
> for our kernel.
>
> Jan
>
Jan,
I was wondering about the following.
In netif_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) the skb->cb is assigend,
but it may be clipped to RX_COPY_THRESHOLD
NETFRONT_SKB_CB(skb)->pull_to = rx->status;
if (NETFRONT_SKB_CB(skb)->pull_to > RX_COPY_THRESHOLD)
NETFRONT_SKB_CB(skb)->pull_to = RX_COPY_THRESHOLD;
How does this modification of NETFRONT_SKB_CB(skb)->pull_to propagates
or is this irrelevant?
Dion
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists