lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 08 Jul 2013 13:41:44 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <>
To:	"Dion Kant" <>
Cc:	"Ian Campbell" <>,
	"Wei Liu" <>, <>,
	<>, <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: pull on receive skb may need to
 happen earlier

>>> On 08.07.13 at 14:16, Dion Kant <> wrote:
> I was wondering about the following.
> In netif_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) the skb->cb is assigend,
> but it may be clipped to RX_COPY_THRESHOLD
> 		NETFRONT_SKB_CB(skb)->pull_to = rx->status;
> 		if (NETFRONT_SKB_CB(skb)->pull_to > RX_COPY_THRESHOLD)
> 		      NETFRONT_SKB_CB(skb)->pull_to = RX_COPY_THRESHOLD;
> How does this modification of NETFRONT_SKB_CB(skb)->pull_to propagates
> or is this irrelevant?

I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. pull_to is a private
(to netfront) field used to communicate how much of the skb
needs to be pulled. I don't see how the word "propagate" makes
any sense here, but as said I may simply not be getting what
you're asking about.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists