netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: pull on receive skb may need to happen earlier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Jul 2013 07:52:31 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
Cc:	"Ian Campbell" <ian.campbell@...rix.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Dion Kant" <g.w.kant@...enet.nl>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: pull on receive skb may
 need to happen earlier

>>> On 08.07.13 at 17:48, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 03:20:26PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -1014,7 +1025,7 @@ err:
>>  
>>  		skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0].page_offset = rx->offset;
>>  		skb_frag_size_set(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0], rx->status);
>> -		skb->data_len = rx->status;
>> +		skb->len = skb->data_len = rx->status;
> 
> This is not correct. You should not be needing this. Now you lose count
> of SKB head len. Try to go without the above line and see if it makes a
> difference?

I don't follow - at this point, there's 0 bytes of head (this only
changes with the first call to __pskb_pull_tail()). Hence ->len ==
->data_len seems correct to me (and afaict pulling would do the
wrong thing if I dropped that change).

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html