netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] sctp: Don't lookup dst if transport dst is still valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51DBB7BB.6020606@windriver.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:11:55 +0800
From:	Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
To:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
CC:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>, <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sctp: Don't lookup dst if transport dst is still
 valid

Hello Neil

On 2013年07月05日 21:03, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:33:35AM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2013年07月03日 21:23, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2013 10:18 PM, Fan Du wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2013年07月02日 22:29, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>>>> On 07/02/2013 02:39 AM, Fan Du wrote:
>>>>>> When sctp sits on IPv6, sctp_transport_dst_check pass cookie as ZERO,
>>>>>> as a result ip6_dst_check always fail out. This behaviour makes
>>>>>> transport->dst useless, because every sctp_packet_transmit must look
>>>>>> for valid dst(Is this what supposed to be?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One aggressive way is to call rt_genid_bump which invalid all dst to
>>>>>> make new dst for transport, apparently it also hurts others.
>>>>>> I'm sure this may not be the best for all, so any commnets?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Fan Du<fan.du@...driver.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> include/net/sctp/sctp.h | 18 ++++++++++++------
>>>>>> net/sctp/ipv6.c | 2 ++
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>>>>> index cd89510..f05af01 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>>>>> @@ -719,14 +719,20 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union
>>>>>> sctp_addr *addr)
>>>>>> addr->v6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[2] = htonl(0x0000ffff);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -/* The cookie is always 0 since this is how it's used in the
>>>>>> - * pmtu code.
>>>>>> - */
>>>>>> +/* Set cookie with the right one for IPv6 and zero for others */
>>>>>> static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct
>>>>>> sctp_transport *t)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> - if (t->dst&&  !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
>>>>>> - dst_release(t->dst);
>>>>>> - t->dst = NULL;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (t->dst) {
>>>>>> + struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)t->dst;
>>>>>> + u32 cookie = 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if ((t->af_specific->sa_family == AF_INET6)&&  rt->rt6i_node)
>>>>>> + cookie = rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum;
>>>>>> + if (!dst_check(t->dst, cookie)) {
>>>>>> + dst_release(t->dst);
>>>>>> + t->dst = NULL;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it would be better if we stored the dst_cookie in the
>>>>> transport structure and initialized it at lookup time. If you do that,
>>>>> then if the route table changes, we'd correctly detect it without
>>>>> artificially bumping rt_genid (and hurting ipv4).
>>>>
>>>> Hi Vlad/Neil
>>>>
>>>> Is this what you mean?
>>>
>>> Yes, exactly.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Vlad
>>
>> I thinks twice about below patch, this is actually a chicken-egg issue.
>> Look below scenario:
>>   (1) The first time we push packet through a transport, dst_cookie is 0,
>>       so sctp_transport_dst_check also pass cookie as 0, then return dst as NULL.
>>       Then we lookup dst by sctp_transport_route, and in there we initiate dst_cookie
>>       with rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum
>>
>>   (2) Then the next time we push packet through this transport again,
>>       we pass dst_cookie(rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum) to ip6_dst_check, and
>>       return valid dst without bothering to lookup dst again.
>>
>> BUT, suppose when deleting the source address of this dst after transport->dst_cookie
>> has been well initialized. transport->dst_cookie still holds rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum,
>> meaning ip6_dst_check will return valid dst, which it shouldn't in this case, the
>> result will be association ABORT.
>>
> Have you tried this?  It seems to me in the situation you describe, deleting a
> source address will result in fib_inetaddr_event getting called, which will call
                                  ^^^^^^^^^^
                                  This is IPv4 specific.

> rt_cache_flush, bumping the rt_genid to get bumped for that network namespace.
> That will cause any subsequent calls to dst_check->ip6_dst_check to return NULL
                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                            This is IPv6 specific
> rather than the cached dst_entry for that transport.

The phenomenon(transport->dst got lookup every time for IPv6) I described before
could be easily observed by turning on SCTP debug.

> Neil
>
>

-- 
浮沉随浪只记今朝笑

--fan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html