netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: rename low latency sockets functions to busy poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130709162514.062f1361@lwn.net>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jul 2013 16:25:14 -0600
From:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:	Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Mortons <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: rename low latency sockets functions to
 busy poll

On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:20:34 +0300
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> Rename POLL_LL to POLL_BUSY_LOOP.

So pardon me if I speak out of turn, but it occurs to me to
wonder...should the SO_LL socket option be renamed in a similar fashion
before this interface escapes into the wild?

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html