[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130710162509.75bbb922@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:25:09 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] vxlan: Fix vs->vni_list locking.
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:08:38 -0700
Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:04:44 -0700
> > Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Use rtnl lock to protect vs->vni_list updates.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > I don't think this is necessary. I intentionally changed the
> > locking when socket management was moved to a work queue.
> > The vxlan_net socket lock is held there already, and finer grain.
>
> what abt vxlan_dellink()?
> it is deleting vxlan-dev from hash table without lock.
Ok, then this should fix it.
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -1768,8 +1768,12 @@ static int vxlan_newlink(struct net *net
static void vxlan_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
{
struct vxlan_dev *vxlan = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct vxlan_net *vn = net_generic(dev_net(dev), vxlan_net_id);
+ spin_lock(&vn->sock_lock);
hlist_del_rcu(&vxlan->hlist);
+ spin_unlock(&vn->sock_lock);
+
list_del(&vxlan->next);
unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, head);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists