[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130710.195523.248795155616961560.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: stephen@...workplumber.org
Cc: pshelar@...ira.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] vxlan: Fix vs->vni_list locking.
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:25:09 -0700
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:08:38 -0700
> Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Stephen Hemminger
>> <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:04:44 -0700
>> > Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Use rtnl lock to protect vs->vni_list updates.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
>> >> ---
>> >
>> > I don't think this is necessary. I intentionally changed the
>> > locking when socket management was moved to a work queue.
>> > The vxlan_net socket lock is held there already, and finer grain.
>>
>> what abt vxlan_dellink()?
>> it is deleting vxlan-dev from hash table without lock.
>
> Ok, then this should fix it.
Looks good, one minor thing:
> {
> struct vxlan_dev *vxlan = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct vxlan_net *vn = net_generic(dev_net(dev), vxlan_net_id);
Please declare 'vn' on the first line rather than the second.
A formal submission with that fixup and a signoff, and I'll apply
this.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists