[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130713101818.0d4fa8e0@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:18:18 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] vxlan: add necessary locking on device removal
The socket management is now done in workqueue (outside of RTNL)
and protected by vn->sock_lock. There were two possible bugs, first
the vxlan device was removed from the VNI hash table per socket without
holding lock. And there was a race when device is created and the workqueue
could run after deletion.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c 2013-07-08 16:31:50.080744429 -0700
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c 2013-07-10 20:15:47.337653899 -0700
@@ -1767,9 +1767,15 @@ static int vxlan_newlink(struct net *net
static void vxlan_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
{
+ struct vxlan_net *vn = net_generic(dev_net(dev), vxlan_net_id);
struct vxlan_dev *vxlan = netdev_priv(dev);
+ flush_workqueue(vxlan_wq);
+
+ spin_lock(&vn->sock_lock);
hlist_del_rcu(&vxlan->hlist);
+ spin_unlock(&vn->sock_lock);
+
list_del(&vxlan->next);
unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, head);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists