netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ip: initialize hash list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1374506158.4990.11.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:15:58 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ip: initialize hash list

On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 08:06 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 07:52 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:46:20 -0700
> > Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> []
> > > Are you doing to do just this one or submit a series?
> > 
> > Hadn't planned on fixing more than one. And would not go outside code
> > that I actually use.
> 
> What a pity.
> 
> I think if you identify what you believe is a
> trivial defect in your own code, it's both
> polite and social to fix similar defects in
> other code too.

Joe, I find this quite misplaced.

So far, there is no bug.

What about fixing real bugs instead ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html