[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374506273.4990.13.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:17:53 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ip: initialize hash list
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 10:26 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Rather than relying on the assumption that zero means empty on
> hash list head, the code should use the initialization macro.
> Same effect, but follows API and avoids future breakage if hlist
> implementation changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
>
>
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c 2013-07-19 09:12:37.213529343 -0700
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c 2013-07-19 09:37:00.960764421 -0700
> @@ -838,10 +838,15 @@ int ip_tunnel_init_net(struct net *net,
> {
> struct ip_tunnel_net *itn = net_generic(net, ip_tnl_net_id);
> struct ip_tunnel_parm parms;
> + unsigned i;
>
> - itn->tunnels = kzalloc(IP_TNL_HASH_SIZE * sizeof(struct hlist_head), GFP_KERNEL);
> + itn->tunnels = kmalloc(IP_TNL_HASH_SIZE * sizeof(struct hlist_head),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!itn->tunnels)
> return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < IP_TNL_HASH_SIZE; i++)
> + INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&itn->tunnels[i]);
>
What about adding a variant of INIT_HLIST_HEAD() that does nothing for
already cleared memory ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists