[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2856794.AWy189S2qk@al>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:07:15 +0200
From: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nic_swsd@...ltek.com
Subject: Re: r8169: remove "PHY reset until link up" log spam
On Tuesday 23 July 2013 08:54:36 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:55:57 +0200
>
> Peter Wu <lekensteyn@...il.com> wrote:
> > This message was added in commit a7154cb8 (June 2004) and is printed
> > every ten seconds when no cable is connected.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Using ethtool to silence *all* link warnings is still a manual
> > operation, in my opinion not acceptable so let's remove this message.
> >
> > The r8169 constantly resets the device when no link is connected,
> > contrary the r8168 vendor driver which only resets the link when some
> > PCI config fields have been modified. As the current reset logic in r8168
> > seems to work for broken device (which I do not have have and therefore
> > cannot test), I did not attempt to "clean this up".
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c index 880015c..63f04af 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> > @@ -3689,8 +3689,6 @@ static void rtl_phy_work(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
> >
> > if (tp->link_ok(ioaddr))
> >
> > return;
> >
> > - netif_warn(tp, link, tp->dev, "PHY reset until link up\n");
> > -
> >
> > tp->phy_reset_enable(tp);
> >
> > out_mod_timer:
> Why not implement netif msg flag to allow user to control this?
Which user wants to get log spam every ten seconds? I see no purpose except
when a developer asks a user to turn this on, or except if you are a
developer. This message was added almost ten years ago, Realtek must certainly
have improved their hardware not to be so crappy?
See also <http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=137452974325684&w=2> where David
Miller wrote:
> In every case where this issue has popped up, we have decided that
> printing messages when the cable is simply unplugged is very
> undesirable.
Regards,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists