[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374787157.3058.28.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:19:17 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: Helmut Grohne <h.grohne@...nusnetworks.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] tuntap: allow overriding ethtool driver
info
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 17:16 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:48:07 +0100
> Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 16:13 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > This patch adds new ioctl to allow setting the ethtool information
> > > returned by the TUN device. This is useful when using tun device as a surrogate
> > > for hardware or other software emulation.
> >
> > I don't like this idea. Which tools are you trying to fool? How does
> > this work when you don't implement any driver-specific behaviour (e.g.
> > SIOCDEVPRIVATE) they expect?
>
> We use surrogate interfaces in user mode application and want to
> display different information for these than the normal TUN device.
What is the problem that can't be solved purely in userland?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists