[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130725143206.03f4975a@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:32:06 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Helmut Grohne <h.grohne@...nusnetworks.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] tuntap: allow overriding ethtool driver
info
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:19:17 +0100
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 17:16 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:48:07 +0100
> > Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 16:13 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > This patch adds new ioctl to allow setting the ethtool information
> > > > returned by the TUN device. This is useful when using tun device as a surrogate
> > > > for hardware or other software emulation.
> > >
> > > I don't like this idea. Which tools are you trying to fool? How does
> > > this work when you don't implement any driver-specific behaviour (e.g.
> > > SIOCDEVPRIVATE) they expect?
> >
> > We use surrogate interfaces in user mode application and want to
> > display different information for these than the normal TUN device.
>
> What is the problem that can't be solved purely in userland?
>
> Ben.
>
There applications (like SNMP) that use ethtool info.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists