[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130724171617.53a48d24@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:16:17 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Helmut Grohne <h.grohne@...nusnetworks.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] tuntap: allow overriding ethtool driver
info
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:48:07 +0100
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 16:13 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > This patch adds new ioctl to allow setting the ethtool information
> > returned by the TUN device. This is useful when using tun device as a surrogate
> > for hardware or other software emulation.
>
> I don't like this idea. Which tools are you trying to fool? How does
> this work when you don't implement any driver-specific behaviour (e.g.
> SIOCDEVPRIVATE) they expect?
We use surrogate interfaces in user mode application and want to
display different information for these than the normal TUN device.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists