[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130724171750.112cf0df@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:17:50 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Helmut Grohne <h.grohne@...nusnetworks.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] tuntap: allow changing ethtool speed (v2)
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:40:50 +0100
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 16:11 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > The data reported by the ethtool interface for tun/tap devices is
> > artificial. The default speed is 10Mbit. Virtual interfaces are often
> > faster than this nowadays, so the observed bandwidth may exceed the
> > available bandwidth. This patch allows an administrator to change the
> > available bandwidth as reported by ethtool.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Helmut Grohne <h.grohne@...nusnetworks.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> >
> > ---
> > v2 - allow setting duplex as well, fix patch formatting
>
> It's logically full duplex so this doesn't make sense to me.
>
> > ignore other settings in set
> [...]
>
> No, please never do that in ethtool_ops::set_settings. Setting
> unsupported values is an error.
Almost every hardware driver out there allows mucking with settings
that it doesn't care about (like transceiver and port). Why be picky now?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists