[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130726064544.GC24247@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:45:44 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: updates to syncookies - timestamps not needed any more (freebsd)
Hi Eric!
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 07:04:45AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> BTW, following patch allows to test more easily syncookies behavior.
>
> If sysctl_tcp_syncookies is set to 2, we always use syncookies.
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> index 35675e4..590659e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> @@ -1462,7 +1462,8 @@ int tcp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> * limitations, they conserve resources and peer is
> * evidently real one.
> */
> - if (inet_csk_reqsk_queue_is_full(sk) && !isn) {
> + if ((sysctl_tcp_syncookies == 2 ||
> + inet_csk_reqsk_queue_is_full(sk)) && !isn) {
> want_cookie = tcp_syn_flood_action(sk, skb, "TCP");
> if (!want_cookie)
> goto drop;
>
While cleaning up my patch directory I found this snippet. Perhaps you
could send it for inclusion for net-next? Three nice additions: a similar
change in tcp_ipv6.c and perhaps get rid of the warning messages printed
to the console in case of syncookies == 2? A small update to ip-sysctl.txt
wouldn't hurt either.
If you want to, I can take it and refresh it.
Thanks,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists