netdev - Re: updates to syncookies - timestamps not needed any more (freebsd)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	fw@...len.de, hannes@...essinduktion.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: updates to syncookies - timestamps not needed any more
 (freebsd)

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:32:43 -0700

> Another quick hack would be to allow sack being generated by the client.
> 
> If we receive sackOK in SYN, then syncookie SYNACK could contain sackOK,
> if timestamps are not used.
> 
> Client would be allowed to use SACK in his ACK. Server would not
> generate SACK, but would process incoming SACK.
> 
> Not sure what could break ?

This seems quite clumsy and would result in being able to use SACK only
in one direction.

There has to be a better way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html