[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130712.163720.1878859530623469256.davem@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: fw@...len.de, hannes@...essinduktion.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: updates to syncookies - timestamps not needed any more
(freebsd)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:32:43 -0700
> Another quick hack would be to allow sack being generated by the client.
>
> If we receive sackOK in SYN, then syncookie SYNACK could contain sackOK,
> if timestamps are not used.
>
> Client would be allowed to use SACK in his ACK. Server would not
> generate SACK, but would process incoming SACK.
>
> Not sure what could break ?
This seems quite clumsy and would result in being able to use SACK only
in one direction.
There has to be a better way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists