netdev - Re: A call to revise sockets behaviour

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <144572220.42656.1375119116406.JavaMail.mail@webmail09>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:31:56 +0000 (UTC)
From:	"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@...os.com>
To:	rick.jones2@...com
Cc:	stephen@...workplumber.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A call to revise sockets behaviour

Jul 29, 2013 11:27:00 PM, rick wrote:

>> A wine developer clearly showed that this option simply doesn't work.
>>
>> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26031#c21
>>
>> Output of strace:
>> getsockopt(24, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [0], [4]) = 0
>> setsockopt(24, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
>> bind(24, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(43012), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.
>> 0.0.0")}, 16) = -1 EADDRINUSE (Address already in use)
>
>The output of netstat -an didn't by any chance happen to still show an 
>endpoint in the LISTEN state for that port number did it?
>
>rick jones
>


By chance - no, nothing is/was listening. You can recreate this test in an order of few
minutes without ever trusting my word.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html