netdev - Re: A call to revise sockets behaviour

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:42:58 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@...os.com>
Cc:	stephen@...workplumber.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A call to revise sockets behaviour

On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:47 +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:

> A wine developer clearly showed that this option simply doesn't work. 
> 
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26031#c21
> 
> Output of strace:
> getsockopt(24, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [0], [4]) = 0
> setsockopt(24, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
> bind(24, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(43012), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.     
> 0.0.0")}, 16) = -1 EADDRINUSE (Address already in use)

Its clear that some other socket did not use SO_REUSADDR

All sockets using a given port _must_ have use SO_REUSADDR to allow this
port being reused.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html