[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130729200114.GA29160@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:01:14 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] net_sched: stack info leak in cbq_dump_wrr()
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:44:32PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 22:36 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > opt.__reserved isn't cleared so we leak a byte of stack information.
> []
> > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_cbq.c b/net/sched/sch_cbq.c
> []
> > @@ -1469,6 +1469,7 @@ static int cbq_dump_wrr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct cbq_class *cl)
> > opt.allot = cl->allot;
> > opt.priority = cl->priority + 1;
> > opt.cpriority = cl->cpriority + 1;
> > + opt.__reserved = 0;
> > opt.weight = cl->weight;
> > if (nla_put(skb, TCA_CBQ_WRROPT, sizeof(opt), &opt))
> > goto nla_put_failure;
>
> Alignment isn't guaranteed here so it'd
> probably be better with a memset.
>
Hm... Which arches would align it differently?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists