[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1375344822.7780.17.camel@cr0>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:13:42 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, ycheng@...gle.com, ncardwell@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] tcp_metrics: rearrange fields to avoid holes
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 00:15 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:48:31 +0800
>
> > Please teach me how to do that?
>
> struct inet_addr {
> union {
> u32 v4;
> u32 v6[4];
> };
> };
>
> ie. exactly what that code is using already.
>
> And it's called called inetpeer_addr, we have it already, there is no
> need to make something new.
>
> Making this code use a structure with completely unnecessary and
> unused members is pointless and a step backwards.
Ah, I was thinking to keep it compatible with sockaddr*, actually this
is indeed unnecessary. I am going to define something like:
struct inet_addr_base {
union {
struct in_addr sin_addr;
struct in6_addr sin6_addr;
};
unsigned short int sin_family;
};
which could used by bridge multicast code too.
Thanks for the hint.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists