| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1375344951.1518.0.camel@linux-fkkt.site> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:15:51 +0200 From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Freddy Xin <freddy@...x.com.tw>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>, Grant Grundler <grundler@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] USB: XHCI: mark no_sg_limit On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 15:30 +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:40:26AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:51:47PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > > This patch marks all xHCI controllers as no_sg_limit since > > > xHCI supports building packet from discontinuous buffers. > > > > > > Cc: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com> > > > > Acked-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com> > > Is it a requirement that all xhci controllers support sg? I know we are > starting to see other controllers (the platform code?) so would they > need to support this as well? The way XHCI describes transfers allows them to be arbitrary. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists