[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130803182500.GA32481@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 20:25:01 +0200
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
jhs@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [net] net_sched: make dev_trans_start return vlan's real dev
trans_start
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 08:19:10PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>On 08/03/2013 08:13 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> On 08/03/2013 07:07 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 05:07:51PM +0200, nikolay@...hat.com wrote:
>>> ...snip...
>>>> + while (is_vlan_dev(dev))
>>>> + dev = vlan_dev_real_dev(dev);
>>>
>>> While at it - I've checked a few users (mainly network drivers) of
>>> vlan_dev_real_dev(dev) and they all rely on that the return device would be
>>> the *real* device, but not another vlan.
>>>
>>> So maybe we should move this while loop to vlan_dev_real_dev() instead?
><snip>
>> Not really, there're users that rely to get only 1 level of real_dev (e.g.
>> netxen ip config which expects a configuration like vlan -> bond -> netxen,
>> and it needs to go from vlan to bond only) which will be broken, there're
>Scratch this part, I need to get some sleep :-)
:)
Yeah, it only modifies the QinQ scenario. I've never used it personally,
though.
Here you go, I think the code is more readable than my english:
diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
index 4a78c4d..6ee48aa 100644
--- a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
+++ b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
@@ -91,7 +91,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vlan_find_dev_deep);
struct net_device *vlan_dev_real_dev(const struct net_device *dev)
{
- return vlan_dev_priv(dev)->real_dev;
+ struct net_device *ret = vlan_dev_priv(dev)->real_dev;
+
+ while (is_vlan_dev(ret))
+ ret = vlan_dev_priv(ret)->real_dev;
+
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vlan_dev_real_dev);
>
>
>> also many non-ethernet users which may rely on similar behaviour.
>> Most of the network drivers don't expect a *real* device, they check if the
>> returned device is one of their own after using that function.
True, and in case of vlan -> vlan -> dev they'll won't find themselves,
which is bad.
>> I'd suggest using a helper that uses vlan_dev_real_dev so we will have both
>> without breaking anything.
I don't have any preference in that, tbh, I don't know the vlan part that
good :).
>>
>> Nik
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists