netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: mlx5: fix sizeof usage in health_care's reg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130805063334.GA22386@mtldesk30>
Date:	Mon, 5 Aug 2013 09:33:34 +0300
From:	Eli Cohen <eli@....mellanox.co.il>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	dborkman@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ogerlitz@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mlx5: fix sizeof usage in health_care's
 reg_handler

On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 03:11:32PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
> Date: Fri,  2 Aug 2013 12:16:17 +0200
> 
> > Therefore, I strongly assume sizeof(*health->health) is being meant
> > to be passed as an argument. Interestingly, there are actually no

Daniel, you're fix is correct. I meant to pass the size of the struct
and not the size of the pointer.

> > in-tree users of mlx5_[un]register_health_report_handler(), but some
> > debugging modules might want to know the correct size instead.
> 
> I want these hooks and infrastructure removed immediately.
> 
> If there are no in-tree users there is no reason for them to
> exist at all.
> 

Hi Dave,
the intention here was to allow other module, if they so wish, to get
notified of any problems detected at the device. I understand that you
don't like this but is there another way to handle this requirement
which will be accepted?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html