[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130807205959.GC21463@macbook.localnet>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 22:59:59 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: pablo@...filter.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, mph@....com, jesper.brouer@...il.com,
as@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] netfilter: implement netfilter SYN proxy
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 11:06:06AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 19:42 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> >
> > The SYNPROXY operates by marking the initial SYN from the client as UNTRACKED
> > and directing it to the SYNPROXY target. The target responds with a SYN/ACK
> > containing a cookie and encodes options such as window scaling factor, SACK
> > perm etc. into the timestamp, if timestamps are used (similar to TCP). The
> > window size is set to zero. The response is also sent as untracked packet.
>
> TCP timestamps are not really used, for various reasons ...
>
> Have you taken a look at
>
> <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2013-July/035999.html>
No, not yet, will have a look. Not sure what you mean by "TCP timestamps
are not really used" though. I might be biased by usually only looking at
Linux traffic, but I was under that impression that everyone is using
TCP timestamps nowadays?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists