netdev - mlx4 interrupt coalescing not important for small packets?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:06:37 -0500
From:	Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@...il.com>
To:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
Subject: mlx4 interrupt coalescing not important for small packets?

I was looking at the adaptive interrupt coalescing algorithm for
mlx4_en which contains the following snippet:

/* Apply auto-moderation only when packet rate
 * exceeds a rate that it matters */
if (rate > (MLX4_EN_RX_RATE_THRESH / priv->rx_ring_num) &&
    avg_pkt_size > MLX4_EN_AVG_PKT_SMALL) {
        if (rate < priv->pkt_rate_low)
                moder_time = priv->rx_usecs_low;
        else if (rate > priv->pkt_rate_high)
                moder_time = priv->rx_usecs_high;
        else
                moder_time = (rate - priv->pkt_rate_low) *
                        (priv->rx_usecs_high - priv->rx_usecs_low) /
                        (priv->pkt_rate_high - priv->pkt_rate_low) +
                        priv->rx_usecs_low;
} else {
        moder_time = priv->rx_usecs_low;
}

In this case MLX4_EN_AVG_PKT_SMALL is 256 bytes.  Can someone explain
to me why interrupt coalescing is not important for small packets
regardless of the incoming packet rate?

Thanks,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html