[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52079053.5070405@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:23:31 +0300
From: Amir Vadai <amirv.mellanox@...il.com>
To: Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@...il.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: mlx4 interrupt coalescing not important for small packets?
On 09/08/2013 20:06, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
> I was looking at the adaptive interrupt coalescing algorithm for
> mlx4_en which contains the following snippet:
>
> /* Apply auto-moderation only when packet rate
> * exceeds a rate that it matters */
> if (rate > (MLX4_EN_RX_RATE_THRESH / priv->rx_ring_num) &&
> avg_pkt_size > MLX4_EN_AVG_PKT_SMALL) {
> if (rate < priv->pkt_rate_low)
> moder_time = priv->rx_usecs_low;
> else if (rate > priv->pkt_rate_high)
> moder_time = priv->rx_usecs_high;
> else
> moder_time = (rate - priv->pkt_rate_low) *
> (priv->rx_usecs_high - priv->rx_usecs_low) /
> (priv->pkt_rate_high - priv->pkt_rate_low) +
> priv->rx_usecs_low;
> } else {
> moder_time = priv->rx_usecs_low;
> }
>
> In this case MLX4_EN_AVG_PKT_SMALL is 256 bytes. Can someone explain
> to me why interrupt coalescing is not important for small packets
> regardless of the incoming packet rate?
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
The idea was that for small packets, should enter "latency mode"
regardless the packet rate.
Amir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists