[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130813204131.GA4696@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 22:41:31 +0200
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: David Shwatrz <dshwatrz@...il.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, grant.likely@...aro.org,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: question about netif_rx
(no top-post nor lazy quote please)
David Shwatrz <dshwatrz@...il.com> :
[...]
> In the napi_gro_receive() we check that the device supports
> NETIF_F_GRO, but I don't see that we inspect checksum or that
> NETIF_F_GRO is depends on checksum.
napi_gro_receive is irrelevant. Let aside tunnel, the real work happens
in the protocol specific gro_receive handlers.
However I am an happy retard and I missed that tcp gro stopped depending
on Rx checksum since commit 861b650101eb0c627d171eb18de81dddb93d395e. :o/
So, yes, napi_gro_receive could be used.
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists