[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJJAcocQ59Kc9a1b=jrNSc1akLLN_74yKANMEmLVmvxoRjX4hw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:53:50 +0300
From: David Shwatrz <dshwatrz@...il.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>, grant.likely@...aro.org,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: question about netif_rx
Hello,
Sorry. I still don't understand what checksum has to do with it.
Does GRO depends on Rx/Tx checksum ? I don't think so.
In the napi_gro_receive() we check that the device supports
NETIF_F_GRO, but I don't see that we inspect checksum or that
NETIF_F_GRO is depends on checksum.
Can you please explain how checsum offload is related ?
rgs
David
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Francois Romieu wrote:
>
>> Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> :
>> > François Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> :
>> [...]
>> > > Can you send a netif_receive_skb replacement patch for it ?
>> >
>> > Just to be sure, I just replace netif_rx by netif_receive_skb, nothing
>> > else?
>>
>> Yes. It should imho be fine with a comment incluing your analysis and a
>> few words about the current state of checksum offloading support.
>
> I wouldn't know what to say about the checksum part. It is not supported
> so I should use netif_receive_skb?
>
> thanks,
> julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists