netdev - Re: [PATCH] driver:net:stmmac: Disable DMA store and forward mode if platform data force_sf_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sonic.adi@...il.com
Cc:	peppe.cavallaro@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, sonic.zhang@...log.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver:net:stmmac: Disable DMA store and forward mode
 if platform data force_sf_dma_mode is negative.

From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.adi@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:37:42 +0800

> Hi David,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:20 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.adi@...il.com>
>> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:37:36 +0800
>>
>>> @@ -1157,7 +1157,9 @@ static void free_dma_desc_resources(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
>>>   */
>>>  static void stmmac_dma_operation_mode(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
>>>  {
>>> -     if (likely(priv->plat->force_sf_dma_mode ||
>>> +     if (priv->plat->force_sf_dma_mode < 0)
>>> +             priv->hw->dma->dma_mode(priv->ioaddr, tc, tc);
>>> +     else if (likely(priv->plat->force_sf_dma_mode > 0 ||
>>>                  ((priv->plat->tx_coe) && (!priv->no_csum_insertion)))) {
>>
>> You need to properly re-indent the last line here so that
>> the openning parenthesis lines up with the first column
>> after the openning parenthesis on the "else if" line.
> 
> The last line is the original source code in master branch of the
> Linus's kernel git tree. Do you mean I should fix the ident issue in
> this patch as well?

I'm saying that, in your patch, the second line in

+     else if (likely(priv->plat->force_sf_dma_mode > 0 ||
                 ((priv->plat->tx_coe) && (!priv->no_csum_insertion)))) {

need to be reindented because you're moving the openning parenthesis
to the left by several columns, therefore the second line needs to move
the same amount.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html