netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] r8169: fix invalid register dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 17 Aug 2013 12:27:38 +0200
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Peter Wu <lekensteyn@...il.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] r8169: fix invalid register dump

On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 11:04 +0200, Peter Wu wrote:
> From: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@...il.com>
> 
> For some reason, my PCIe RTL8111E onboard NIC on a GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3
> motherboard reads as FFs when reading from MMIO with a block size
> larger than 7. Therefore change to reading blocks of four bytes.
> 
> Thanks to Francois for a better implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> index b5eb419..2943916 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> @@ -1897,12 +1897,16 @@ static void rtl8169_get_regs(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_regs *regs,
>  			     void *p)
>  {
>  	struct rtl8169_private *tp = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	u32 __iomem *data = tp->mmio_addr;
> +	u32 *dw = p;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	if (regs->len > R8169_REGS_SIZE)
>  		regs->len = R8169_REGS_SIZE;
>  
>  	rtl_lock_work(tp);
> -	memcpy_fromio(p, tp->mmio_addr, regs->len);
> +	for (i = regs->len; i > 0; i -= 4)
> +		memcpy_fromio(dw++, data++, min(4, i));

I would be very wary of accessing registers with any width other than
the usual (32 bits).

And as I said, the kernel buffer is always large enough for all your
registers, so this could just be:

	for (i = 0; i < R8169_REGS_SIZE; i += 4)
		memcpy_fromio(dw++, data++, 4);

Ben.

>  	rtl_unlock_work(tp);
>  }
>  

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html