[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPshTCh3CqrgasEvFG_Yy8NRHMp_rrQDqn7eRMD9NycmpxaWkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 04:55:15 -0700
From: Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Dmitry Kravkov <dkravkov@...il.com>,
Dmitry Kravkov <dmitry@...adcom.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] bnx2x: add RSS capability for GRE traffic
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 21:52 +0300, Dmitry Kravkov wrote:
>
>>
>> Current bnx2x HW is not able to perform CSUM validation for
>> encapsulated packets, so in any case host needs to do that.
>> Today GRO/TPA feature depends on CSUM, but theoretically (i did not
>> investigate it) and probably HW can provide aggregated packets w/o
>> csum validation - this will save headers processing for host.
>
> I am not sure I understand this.
>
> Aggregation cannot be done if csums are not validated.
Unless all the csums from aggregated pkts are also aggregated into one
(so that the host computes s/w csum on the large pkt and validates against
the aggregated csum...) There may be some performance benefit for doing
this but it may arguably weaken already weak 1's complement csum.
Jerry
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists