lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1376840262.21329.40.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Sun, 18 Aug 2013 08:37:42 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Kravkov <dkravkov@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Kravkov <dmitry@...adcom.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] bnx2x: add RSS capability for GRE traffic

On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 04:55 -0700, Jerry Chu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 21:52 +0300, Dmitry Kravkov wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Current bnx2x HW is not able to perform CSUM validation for
> >> encapsulated packets, so in any case host needs to do that.
> >> Today GRO/TPA feature depends on CSUM, but theoretically (i did not
> >> investigate it) and probably HW can provide aggregated packets w/o
> >> csum validation - this will save headers processing for host.
> >
> > I am not sure I understand this.
> >
> > Aggregation cannot be done if csums are not validated.
> 
> Unless all the csums from aggregated pkts are also aggregated into one
> (so that the host computes s/w csum on the large pkt and validates against
> the aggregated csum...) There may be some performance benefit for doing
> this but it may arguably weaken already weak 1's complement csum.

To aggregate two packets, you first have to make sure the checksums of
each packet are ok. If the hardware does not validate checksum, then it
cannot aggregate packets.

Sure, CHECKSUM_COMPLETE support would be nice, so that linux can perform
aggregation without having to bring into cpu cache the whole frame.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ