[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1377273955.8828.13.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:05:55 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@...il.com>
Cc: pablo@...filter.org, kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
davem@...emloft.net, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: avoid array overflow in nf_register_hook
On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 23:04 -0400, Dong Fang wrote:
> This patch fix the array overflow in nf_register_hook function
>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@...il.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/core.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
> index 2217363..819eee1 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
> @@ -68,8 +68,11 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(nf_hook_mutex);
> int nf_register_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
> {
> struct nf_hook_ops *elem;
> - int err;
> + int err = -EINVAL;
>
> + if (reg->pf >= NFPROTO_NUMPROTO || reg->hooknum >= NF_MAX_HOOKS)
> + return err;
> +
Thats a bug in the caller.
We want a hard crash so that the poor netfilter guy who made this error
can fix the bug before sending us a buggy patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists