| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:18:44 +0200 From: Teco Boot <teco@...-net.nl> To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>, Ferry Huberts <mailings@...ie.com>, Netem <netem@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "core-users@...itd.nrl.navy.mil" <core-users@...itd.nrl.navy.mil> Subject: Re: netem: the reorder discussion Op 23 aug. 2013 om 18:03 heeft Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 17:53 +0200, Teco Boot wrote: > >> Questions that pops out of of my head: What is more important, >> understandable configuration or keep existing behavior for unmodified >> configuration? Do we want to reorder, even with configured rate? >> >> My preference: make in understandable, document well and make all >> sensible options available. > > The day 'rate' support was added, documentation became obsolete. > > Its actually hard to have both rate and delay + jitters + reorders or > not. > > If you can fix this properly, patches are welcome, but I suspect you > wanted to reintroduce the thing that made netem unusable for us. No, for sure I do not want to make it unusable for you. Or anybody. The opposite is true. I don't like the "look in souce" documentation. Or parameters with hard to understand side effects. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists