[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5217BA50.6050609@ti.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 01:08:56 +0530
From: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
To: Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bcousson@...libre.com>,
<nsekhar@...com>, <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <ujhelyi.m@...il.com>,
<vaibhav.bedia@...com>, <d-gerlach@...com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register
On Saturday 24 August 2013 01:02 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the 6th version of my patch set, the version history is below.
>
> Note that for personal reasons, I won't be able to work on that patch
> set for two weeks, starting from a few hours from now. If there are any
> more objections or comments, I'll catch up after that period. Or if
> anyone wants to make minor changes to my patches and resubmit them,
> I'd also be fine with that :)
>
> The compatibility discussion is still ongoing, but I'd rather submit
> what I got until now, and I'm also still convinced that having
> ti,am3352-cpsw is the best we can do.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> v5 -> v6:
> * re-add code to fail if 3rd memory region is given but invalid
> * added Mugunthan's ack on all patches except the one that adds
> ti,am3352-cpsw
> * remove parens around integer constants
I am also in your favour of adding ti,am3352-cpsw, but lets get other
comment. You can add my ack to that patch also if you are submitting
another version.
Regards
Mugunthan V N
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists