netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 21:41:32 +0200
From:	Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>
To:	Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bcousson@...libre.com, nsekhar@...com,
	sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	ujhelyi.m@...il.com, vaibhav.bedia@...com, d-gerlach@...com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register

On 23.08.2013 21:38, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> On Saturday 24 August 2013 01:02 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:

>> v5 -> v6:
>> 	* re-add code to fail if 3rd memory region is given but invalid
>> 	* added Mugunthan's ack on all patches except the one that adds
>> 	  ti,am3352-cpsw
>> 	* remove parens around integer constants
> I am also in your favour of adding ti,am3352-cpsw, but lets get other
> comment. You can add my ack to that patch also if you are submitting
> another version.

I don't think I'll have a chance to do that before I'm AFK for a while :)

That's also the only reason why I sent a v6 already. I would have
normally waited for that discussion to settle of course.

But as I said: I'd be fine if anyone adds another patch on top or amends
mine.


Thanks for the reviews again, everyone!


Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html