[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1377551155.1877.18.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:05:55 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mrkiko.rs@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, oliver@...kum.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V3 net-next 2/3] net: huawei_cdc_ncm: Introduce
the huawei_cdc_ncm driver
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 16:58 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:45:13 -0700
>
> > I think the premise of local variable
> > declaration by line length is flawed.
>
> I disagree.
>
> > It can't work when local variables are
> > dependent on initialization order as
> > above.
>
> Move the initialization below the declarations.
So all initializations should be on separate
lines from declarations?
ick.
It's possible, but it doubles the associated
line count and I still think it's a very
dubious premise/practice/style.
As a general rule, it's I suppose OK, but as
a hardened rule, it's like most all hard rules.
It's made to be broken.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists