netdev - Re: [PATCH RESEND V3 net-next 2/3] net: huawei_cdc_ncm: Introduce the huawei_cdc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Aug 2013 17:09:22 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	joe@...ches.com
Cc:	mrkiko.rs@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, oliver@...kum.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V3 net-next 2/3] net: huawei_cdc_ncm: Introduce
 the huawei_cdc_ncm driver

From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:05:55 -0700

> On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 16:58 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:45:13 -0700
>> 
>> > I think the premise of local variable
>> > declaration by line length is flawed.
>> 
>> I disagree.
>> 
>> > It can't work when local variables are
>> > dependent on initialization order as
>> > above.
>> 
>> Move the initialization below the declarations.
> 
> So all initializations should be on separate
> lines from declarations?

No, you can often make it work out when the initialization
occurs on the same time.

Like everything else in life, you evaluate it on a case by
case basis.

Don't try to over-simplify things and act as if they are black
and white when they aren't.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html