[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130830165550.GA8151@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:55:50 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for Renesys H8/300 architecture
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:40:35AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> H8/300 has been dead for several years, the kernel for it has
> not compiled for ages, and recent versions of gcc for it are broken.
> It is time to drop support for it.
>
> Yes, I understand it is not that simple to drop an architecture,
> and it may need some discussion, but someone has to put a stake
> into the ground. Keeping a virtually dead architecture on life support
> takes resources which are better spent elsewhere.
If this doesn't build, and no one is using it anymore, I agree, it
should be removed. If someone wants to revive it, 'git revert' works
just fine.
You can put my:
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
on these patches, unless someone steps up to be the active maintainer of
the arch and gets it building/working again.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists