[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130830.143020.1246803952303746167.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:30:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux@...ck-us.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, wim@...ana.be,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, eparis@...hat.com, jiang.liu@...wei.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for Renesys H8/300 architecture
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:55:50 -0700
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:40:35AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> H8/300 has been dead for several years, the kernel for it has
>> not compiled for ages, and recent versions of gcc for it are broken.
>> It is time to drop support for it.
>>
>> Yes, I understand it is not that simple to drop an architecture,
>> and it may need some discussion, but someone has to put a stake
>> into the ground. Keeping a virtually dead architecture on life support
>> takes resources which are better spent elsewhere.
>
> If this doesn't build, and no one is using it anymore, I agree, it
> should be removed. If someone wants to revive it, 'git revert' works
> just fine.
>
> You can put my:
>
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> on these patches, unless someone steps up to be the active maintainer of
> the arch and gets it building/working again.
I completely agree with Greg, and for the IDE and networking bits:
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists