[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1F990F8245A4214A8CC4BFFBD9F790F908B4283D@039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 02:25:08 +0000
From: Li Frank-B20596 <B20596@...escale.com>
To: Duan Fugang-B38611 <B38611@...escale.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bhutchings@...arflare.com" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: fec: fix the error to get the previous BD entry
> > > Due to get tx & rx previous description use the same function
> > > fec_enet_get_prevdesc(). If put the logic into
> > > fec_enet_get_prevdesc(), I think it is better to split the function
> > > to fec_enet_get_tx_prevdesc(),fec_enet_get_rx_prevdesc().
> > >
> > > If you agree it, I will submit one patch to do it.
> >
> > It doesn't looks good to split to two functions.
> > Can we use if (p == fep->tx_base || p == fep->rx_base) to check if get
> > first entry of queue?
>
> Yes, this check can get the first entry of queue, but the ring size is
> different for rx and tx ring.
> In current driver, there have no tx/rx ring size variable define in struct
> fec_enet_private.
>
> And, if change fec_enet_get_prevdesc(), the fec_enet_get_nextdesc() may need
> to do related logic change for nicety code.
Yes, it should be better handle this logical in get_prevdesc and get_nextdesc.
So we have unified place to handle wrap.
>
> > Best regards
> > Frank Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists