[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <522F2BA7.3090308@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:24:39 -0400
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/4] bridge: Fix updating FDB entries when the PVID
is applied
On 09/10/2013 06:39 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> We currently set the value that variable vid pointing, which will be used
> in FDB later, to 0 at br_allowed_ingress() when we receive untagged or
> priority-tagged frames, even though the PVID is valid.
> This leads to FDB updates in such a wrong way that they are learned with
> VID 0.
> Update the value to that of PVID if the PVID is applied.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...hat.com>
-vlad
> ---
> net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> index 5a9c44a..53f0990 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ bool br_allowed_ingress(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_port_vlans *v,
> /* PVID is set on this port. Any untagged or priority-tagged
> * ingress frame is considered to belong to this vlan.
> */
> + *vid = pvid;
> if (likely(err))
> /* Untagged Frame. */
> __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, htons(ETH_P_8021Q), pvid);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists