[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1378882832.3495.12.camel@ubuntu-vm-makita>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:00:32 +0900
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
To: vyasevic@...hat.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/4] bridge: Handle priority-tagged frames properly
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 10:03 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 06:34 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> > IEEE 802.1Q says that when we receive priority-tagged (VID 0) frames
> > use the PVID for the port as its VID.
> > (See IEEE 802.1Q-2005 6.7.1 and Table 9-2)
> >
> > Apply the PVID to not only untagged frames but also priority-tagged frames.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
> > ---
> > net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> > index 21b6d21..5a9c44a 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> > @@ -189,6 +189,8 @@ out:
> > bool br_allowed_ingress(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_port_vlans *v,
> > struct sk_buff *skb, u16 *vid)
> > {
> > + int err;
> > +
> > /* If VLAN filtering is disabled on the bridge, all packets are
> > * permitted.
> > */
> > @@ -201,20 +203,31 @@ bool br_allowed_ingress(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_port_vlans *v,
> > if (!v)
> > return false;
> >
> > - if (br_vlan_get_tag(skb, vid)) {
> > + err = br_vlan_get_tag(skb, vid);
> > + if (!*vid) {
> > u16 pvid = br_get_pvid(v);
> >
> > - /* Frame did not have a tag. See if pvid is set
> > - * on this port. That tells us which vlan untagged
> > - * traffic belongs to.
> > + /* Frame had a tag with VID 0 or did not have a tag.
> > + * See if pvid is set on this port. That tells us which
> > + * vlan untagged or priority-tagged traffic belongs to.
> > */
> > if (pvid == VLAN_N_VID)
> > return false;
> >
> > - /* PVID is set on this port. Any untagged ingress
> > - * frame is considered to belong to this vlan.
> > + /* PVID is set on this port. Any untagged or priority-tagged
> > + * ingress frame is considered to belong to this vlan.
> > */
> > - __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, htons(ETH_P_8021Q), pvid);
> > + if (likely(err))
> > + /* Untagged Frame. */
> > + __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, htons(ETH_P_8021Q), pvid);
> > + else
> > + /* Priority-tagged Frame.
> > + * At this point, We know that skb->vlan_tci had
> > + * VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit and its VID field was 0x000.
> > + * We update only VID field and preserve PCP field.
> > + */
> > + skb->vlan_tci |= pvid;
> > +
>
> In the case of a priority tagged frame, we should unroll the
> modification above and restore the VID field to 0. Otherwise, you
> may end up either stripping the vlan header completely or forwarding
> with pvid of the ingress port.
Thank you for reviewing.
It is my intended behavior that an incoming priority-tagged frame is
forwarded as a frame untagged or tagged with pvid.
IEEE 802.1Q-2011:
section 8.1.7 Conversion of frame formats
NOTE - As all incoming frames, including priority-tagged frames, are
classified as belonging to a VLAN, the transmitting Port transmits
VLAN-tagged frames or untagged frames. Hence, a station sending a
priority-tagged frame via a Bridge will receive a response that is
either VLAN-tagged or untagged, as described in 8.5.
3. Definitions
3.132 Priority-tagged frame: A tagged frame whose tag header carries
priority information but carries no VLAN identification information.
3.203 VLAN-tagged frame: A VLAN-tagged frame is a tagged frame whose
tag header carries *both* VLAN identification and priority
information.
Toshiaki Makita
>
> -vlad
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists